The material on this website is for information only
and is not intended as any recommendation or endorsement of any products or companies mentioned. We are not licensed by the FSA to give financial advice, and none of the material on this website constitutes or is intended to constitute financial ...
News
This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news
Belfast TelegraphBBC's Nolan 'distracted' as credit cards hacked during live TV programmeBelfast Telegraph"I think my cards have been hacked," he said explaining how he had been distracted during the past couple of minutes. "I'm currently spending money in three hotels in three different parts of the world." He later revealed the transactions had been made ...
Express.co.ukBlack Friday 2017: Don't click on THESE scam text messages offering Christmas bargainsExpress.co.ukBut experts fear cyber criminals will try to capitalise on the Christmas sales bonanza to steal people's credit card details. Con artists are already using WhatsApp to send fake supermarket ... Harry Rose, Money Editor of Which!, said: "Consumers must ...
Mirror.co.ukHow the Budget will affect ordinary people - and it doesn't seem like anyone is really better offMirror.co.ukA charity has told me the average working single person will be £800 per year worse off. “That scares me as there really is nothing left to cut back on. My credit card would end up melting from over-use. It already takes a hammering each month, just to ...Full Autumn Budget 2017 round-up as Chancellor unveils Government spending plansMoneySavingExpertBudget 2017: What it means for working parents with their own businessExpress.co.ukall 2,295 news articles »
The GuardianWhat the 2017 autumn budget means for youThe GuardianWe've looked at the figures to see how Philip Hammond's autumn budget will affect your finances – whether you're single, married, with or without children or retired. All figures supplied by KPMG, StepChange Debt Charity and Turquoise Training ...
Have you met...
Latest Members:


amazingz


MasonFoster


roknmesaleia


meshmesha


John


kuda321


samumba

 

Jeremy Clarkson vs Eco Expert: Battle of the Hybrid Car Reviewers!

Jeremy Clarkson vs Eco Expert: Battle of the Hybrid Car Reviewers!


I would usually advocate that environmentalists take a non-confrontational approach. It’s usually unhelpful to set up an ‘us versus them’ dynamic. Besides, most moderate readers would conclude the truth is about half way in between, or that there’s a ‘third way’. Those people are wise. Nevertheless, I think Jeremy Clarkson needs challenging on his review of the Honda Insight, and I think framing it as an all out battle might help him to take notice! 

Clarkson starts his review skipping over the fuel efficiency of the new Honda Insight, the point of the car. He tries to brush off the benefits to the planet: “sure, you could get 60 or more mpg if you were careful. And that’s not bad for a spacious five-door hatchback.” He prefers to base his review on “what it’s like as a car” to drive.  

JC says: “It’s terrible. Biblically terrible.”

EE says: “It’s fine. Biblically fine.”

I have to wonder if Clarkson and I actually drove the same car. But we did. We both test drove the new Honda Insight 1.3 Hybrid, around mid 2009.

ecoexpert_logo.gifJC says: “It’s worse than the sound of your parachute failing to open. Really, to get an idea of how awful it is, you’d have to sit a dog on a ham slicer.”

EE says: “I couldn’t really hear the engine.” 

Now I have to apologise to my readers. My language above was not as amusing as Clarkson’s. Perhaps I should rephrase, you know, just for effect.

In_Gear_556559a.gifEE says: “It sounds better than your parachute opening and drifting serenely to a soft sand beach for a peaceful landing. Really, to get an idea of how peaceful it is, you’d have to inject a dog with a tranquiliser”.

I think I’ve made my point. Clarkson is known for his colourful over emphasis, but in this case, I believe it’s at the expense of accuracy, and the planet. The engine doesn’t make your ears bleed, the seats don’t ruin your skeleton, and the top speed is a lot more than 23mph. Clarkson, you’re exaggerating. And what’s worse, numerically inaccurate. Not that anyone would believe 23mph anyway. Clarkson therefore effectively admits to his own journalistic hyperbole.

The systematically unfounded rantings of a famous petrol head have a dark side when people base their buying decisions on them. That dark side is the 150,000 women, men and children who currently pay for global warming with their lives each year. Tell readers in China and India not to buy the Honda Insight, and you’re adding to climate change. Perhaps I should over emphasise my point here for effect, and depict an image of Clarkson issuing death warrants and licences to drown.

Yes I noticed that the Honda Insight 1.3 has slightly less power than a Ford Mondeo 2.0. But it felt similar to any other 1.3. I pulled away from a roundabout pretty sharpish, getting me out of sticky situation. If you want to tow a caravan, maybe you need a 2.0, but for most people the 1.3 is fine. 

We can at least try to say something is fine and be entertaining at the same time. How about we do a joint press release stating:

“If you want a normal family car that is “biblically fine”, buy the Honda Insight. It was built in Honda’s Fine Factory, designed by a team lead by Professor Fine of Fine University, Fineland.”


Atul Srivastava
Eco Expert
www.ecoexpert.tv
Follow my daily Twitter updates of Eco News: http://twitter.com/ecoexperttv

Sources and thanks to:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_clarkson/article6294116.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1

Advertise with us  |  Privacy  |  Terms & Copyright                                                                                     Website maintained by USP Networks