The material on this website is for information only
and is not intended as any recommendation or endorsement of any products or companies mentioned. We are not licensed by the FSA to give financial advice, and none of the material on this website constitutes or is intended to constitute financial ...
News
Telegraph.co.ukPension choice for 130000 Tata steel workersTelegraph.co.ukThe letters, seen by Telegraph Money, ask savers to pick between sticking with the existing British Steel scheme, which will fall into the Pension Protection Fund (PPF), the “lifeboat” scheme for “final salary” plans, or moving to an entirely new ...
The GuardianOne in three UK retirees will have to rely solely on state pension ...The GuardianAbout 15 million people have no pension savings and face a bleak future in retirement, according to a major survey of Britain's personal finances published this ...Young people rely on parents and credit cards to cover costsFinancial Timesall 27 news articles »
The GuardianSlow start for auto-enrolment pensions with returns of just £2500The GuardianFigures from pension company Aegon reveal that for someone earning the average UK wage of £26,500 who met the basic requirements of the scheme, their pension pot after five years is now typically worth £2,440. For many people, £2,440 will ... Meanwhile ...
The GuardianOne in three UK retirees will have to rely solely on state pensionThe GuardianAbout 15 million people have no pension savings and face a bleak future in retirement, according to a major survey of Britain's personal finances published this week by the Financial Conduct Authority. The Financial Lives survey of 13,000 consumers by ...Young people rely on parents and credit cards to cover costsFinancial Timesall 27 news articles »
Telegraph.co.uk'My £4845 pension policy is now worth £945'Telegraph.co.ukIn 1995 I took out a pension policy with J Rothschild Assurance. I could ill-afford ... I was told I could not have the money in it. I presumed ... You started a Personal Retirement Plan in 1995 and stopped contributing to it in 1998 as you could no ...
Have you met...
Latest Members:


John


kuda321


samumba


yan


Cav1991


sophiacharles


Amelia Moore

 

Jeremy Clarkson vs Eco Expert: Battle of the Hybrid Car Reviewers!

Jeremy Clarkson vs Eco Expert: Battle of the Hybrid Car Reviewers!


I would usually advocate that environmentalists take a non-confrontational approach. It’s usually unhelpful to set up an ‘us versus them’ dynamic. Besides, most moderate readers would conclude the truth is about half way in between, or that there’s a ‘third way’. Those people are wise. Nevertheless, I think Jeremy Clarkson needs challenging on his review of the Honda Insight, and I think framing it as an all out battle might help him to take notice! 

Clarkson starts his review skipping over the fuel efficiency of the new Honda Insight, the point of the car. He tries to brush off the benefits to the planet: “sure, you could get 60 or more mpg if you were careful. And that’s not bad for a spacious five-door hatchback.” He prefers to base his review on “what it’s like as a car” to drive.  

JC says: “It’s terrible. Biblically terrible.”

EE says: “It’s fine. Biblically fine.”

I have to wonder if Clarkson and I actually drove the same car. But we did. We both test drove the new Honda Insight 1.3 Hybrid, around mid 2009.

ecoexpert_logo.gifJC says: “It’s worse than the sound of your parachute failing to open. Really, to get an idea of how awful it is, you’d have to sit a dog on a ham slicer.”

EE says: “I couldn’t really hear the engine.” 

Now I have to apologise to my readers. My language above was not as amusing as Clarkson’s. Perhaps I should rephrase, you know, just for effect.

In_Gear_556559a.gifEE says: “It sounds better than your parachute opening and drifting serenely to a soft sand beach for a peaceful landing. Really, to get an idea of how peaceful it is, you’d have to inject a dog with a tranquiliser”.

I think I’ve made my point. Clarkson is known for his colourful over emphasis, but in this case, I believe it’s at the expense of accuracy, and the planet. The engine doesn’t make your ears bleed, the seats don’t ruin your skeleton, and the top speed is a lot more than 23mph. Clarkson, you’re exaggerating. And what’s worse, numerically inaccurate. Not that anyone would believe 23mph anyway. Clarkson therefore effectively admits to his own journalistic hyperbole.

The systematically unfounded rantings of a famous petrol head have a dark side when people base their buying decisions on them. That dark side is the 150,000 women, men and children who currently pay for global warming with their lives each year. Tell readers in China and India not to buy the Honda Insight, and you’re adding to climate change. Perhaps I should over emphasise my point here for effect, and depict an image of Clarkson issuing death warrants and licences to drown.

Yes I noticed that the Honda Insight 1.3 has slightly less power than a Ford Mondeo 2.0. But it felt similar to any other 1.3. I pulled away from a roundabout pretty sharpish, getting me out of sticky situation. If you want to tow a caravan, maybe you need a 2.0, but for most people the 1.3 is fine. 

We can at least try to say something is fine and be entertaining at the same time. How about we do a joint press release stating:

“If you want a normal family car that is “biblically fine”, buy the Honda Insight. It was built in Honda’s Fine Factory, designed by a team lead by Professor Fine of Fine University, Fineland.”


Atul Srivastava
Eco Expert
www.ecoexpert.tv
Follow my daily Twitter updates of Eco News: http://twitter.com/ecoexperttv

Sources and thanks to:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_clarkson/article6294116.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1

Advertise with us  |  Privacy  |  Terms & Copyright                                                                                     Website maintained by USP Networks