The material on this website is for information only
and is not intended as any recommendation or endorsement of any products or companies mentioned. We are not licensed by the FSA to give financial advice, and none of the material on this website constitutes or is intended to constitute financial ...
News
Daily MailConservatives threaten revolt against George Osborne over 'time bomb' taxDaily MailAs savings levels fall, around 6 per cent of Britain's gross domestic product would be wiped out over the next 20 years, according to research – the equivalent of almost £120billion in today's money. Businesses ... But Mr Osborne, under pressure to ...and more »
AOL Money UK78% of UK retail spending made with plastic, figures showAOL Money UKNearly four in every five pounds of spending at UK retailers is made through debit and credit cards, figures from a trade body show. The UK Cards Association released the findings to mark 10 years since the introduction of Chip and Pin on Valentine's Day.and more »
AOL Money UK'60% go on credit detox' before making financial applicationAOL Money UKNearly two-thirds of Britons will go on a "credit detox" before taking out a product like a credit card, loan or mortgage - but many return to their bad habits as soon as their application gets approved, a survey has found. ... Steps taken while on a ...and more »
BBC NewsNumber of Scottish house movers rises, but at slower rateBBC NewsThe Bank of Scotland said the new land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT), which replaced stamp duty, helped movers save money and encouraged more transactions. Rising house prices ... Bank of Scotland mortgages director Nicola Noble said: "The ...and more »
Telegraph.co.ukSoon you won't need cash to vend snacks and drinks - or buy parking ticketsTelegraph.co.ukPartly because of the diminishing need for people to carry coins, nearly four in every five pounds (78.5pc) spent in UK shops is now made through debit and credit cards, figures from the UK Cards Association showed. By contrast, when chip and pin was ...and more »
Have you met...
Latest Members:


AYAT


RinjaniHalomi


doaanile7


donjuancuk


jakibadr


Sloane Beck


jappleseed

 

Jeremy Clarkson vs Eco Expert: Battle of the Hybrid Car Reviewers!

Jeremy Clarkson vs Eco Expert: Battle of the Hybrid Car Reviewers!


I would usually advocate that environmentalists take a non-confrontational approach. It’s usually unhelpful to set up an ‘us versus them’ dynamic. Besides, most moderate readers would conclude the truth is about half way in between, or that there’s a ‘third way’. Those people are wise. Nevertheless, I think Jeremy Clarkson needs challenging on his review of the Honda Insight, and I think framing it as an all out battle might help him to take notice! 

Clarkson starts his review skipping over the fuel efficiency of the new Honda Insight, the point of the car. He tries to brush off the benefits to the planet: “sure, you could get 60 or more mpg if you were careful. And that’s not bad for a spacious five-door hatchback.” He prefers to base his review on “what it’s like as a car” to drive.  

JC says: “It’s terrible. Biblically terrible.”

EE says: “It’s fine. Biblically fine.”

I have to wonder if Clarkson and I actually drove the same car. But we did. We both test drove the new Honda Insight 1.3 Hybrid, around mid 2009.

ecoexpert_logo.gifJC says: “It’s worse than the sound of your parachute failing to open. Really, to get an idea of how awful it is, you’d have to sit a dog on a ham slicer.”

EE says: “I couldn’t really hear the engine.” 

Now I have to apologise to my readers. My language above was not as amusing as Clarkson’s. Perhaps I should rephrase, you know, just for effect.

In_Gear_556559a.gifEE says: “It sounds better than your parachute opening and drifting serenely to a soft sand beach for a peaceful landing. Really, to get an idea of how peaceful it is, you’d have to inject a dog with a tranquiliser”.

I think I’ve made my point. Clarkson is known for his colourful over emphasis, but in this case, I believe it’s at the expense of accuracy, and the planet. The engine doesn’t make your ears bleed, the seats don’t ruin your skeleton, and the top speed is a lot more than 23mph. Clarkson, you’re exaggerating. And what’s worse, numerically inaccurate. Not that anyone would believe 23mph anyway. Clarkson therefore effectively admits to his own journalistic hyperbole.

The systematically unfounded rantings of a famous petrol head have a dark side when people base their buying decisions on them. That dark side is the 150,000 women, men and children who currently pay for global warming with their lives each year. Tell readers in China and India not to buy the Honda Insight, and you’re adding to climate change. Perhaps I should over emphasise my point here for effect, and depict an image of Clarkson issuing death warrants and licences to drown.

Yes I noticed that the Honda Insight 1.3 has slightly less power than a Ford Mondeo 2.0. But it felt similar to any other 1.3. I pulled away from a roundabout pretty sharpish, getting me out of sticky situation. If you want to tow a caravan, maybe you need a 2.0, but for most people the 1.3 is fine. 

We can at least try to say something is fine and be entertaining at the same time. How about we do a joint press release stating:

“If you want a normal family car that is “biblically fine”, buy the Honda Insight. It was built in Honda’s Fine Factory, designed by a team lead by Professor Fine of Fine University, Fineland.”


Atul Srivastava
Eco Expert
www.ecoexpert.tv
Follow my daily Twitter updates of Eco News: http://twitter.com/ecoexperttv

Sources and thanks to:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_clarkson/article6294116.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1

Advertise with us  |  Privacy  |  Terms & Copyright                                                                                     Website maintained by USP Networks